mirror of
https://github.com/saltstack/salt.git
synced 2025-04-17 10:10:20 +00:00
Fix incorrect usage of "finite" wrt ordering
This commit is contained in:
parent
b0bf7eba9b
commit
2215d92ab0
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ exist on the subject, to either execute in an imperative fashion where things
|
|||
are executed in the order in which they are defined, or in a declarative
|
||||
fashion where dependencies need to be mapped between objects.
|
||||
|
||||
Imperative ordering is finite and generally considered easier to write, but
|
||||
Imperative ordering is deterministic generally considered easier to write, but
|
||||
declarative ordering is much more powerful and flexible but generally considered
|
||||
more difficult to create.
|
||||
|
||||
Salt has been created to get the best of both worlds. States are evaluated in
|
||||
a finite order, which guarantees that states are always executed in the same
|
||||
a deterministic order, which guarantees that states are always executed in the same
|
||||
order, and the states runtime is declarative, making Salt fully aware of
|
||||
dependencies via the `requisite` system.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ State Auto Ordering
|
|||
|
||||
.. versionadded: 0.17.0
|
||||
|
||||
Salt always executes states in a finite manner, meaning that they will always
|
||||
Salt always executes states in a deterministic manner, meaning that they will always
|
||||
execute in the same order regardless of the system that is executing them. This
|
||||
evaluation order makes it easy to know what order the states will be executed in,
|
||||
but it is important to note that the requisite system will override the ordering
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue